What Is The Purpose of Government Essay

Example #1

The purpose of the government to me is ultimately having the responsibility for the individuals living in society as well as the land that those individuals live on. The sole purpose for the government comes down to the wellbeing of individuals and what it can do to make sure that every single person has equal rights and liberties while bringing stability as well.

The most important purpose for me is that the government maintains a stable society. If we did not have stability, then I don’t think we would be where we are today. Stability to me is having control of society, while society determines who has that control. We are allowed to vote and have free speech, which in return, lets society as a whole elect who we think will look out for our individual interest, as well as the society as a whole. A big contributor to having stability is human nature.

Writing service	Conditions	Website
[Rated 96/100]	Prices start at $12 Min. deadline 6 hours Writers: ESL Refund: Yes Payment methods: VISA, MasterCard, American Express	Hire Writer
[Rated 94/100]	Prices start at $11 Min. deadline 3 hours Writers: ESL, ENL Refund: Yes Payment methods: VISA, MasterCard, American Express, Discover	Hire Writer DISCOUNT 10%
[Rated 91/100]	Prices start at $12 Min. deadline 3 hours Writers: ESL, ENL Refund: Yes Payment methods: VISA, MasterCard, JCB, Discover	Hire Writer

It is on us as a society to help protect each other from the ones that choose not to adhere to the rules in place to help keep that stability. We as a society need some sense of civic sense and responsibility to be able to not only look out for each other but help enforce the rules set in place to keep a safe and friendly environment. As human nature would have it, we cannot predict how another human being will act toward another or even act out when put in a certain setting.

Therefore, we need the government to make laws that can prevent or detour negative acts while among society. Another factor for stability in society is having economic stability. Without economic stability, society would become stagnant and would not be able to grow, therefore making it difficult to stabilize. Not having economic stability makes society have a negative outlook on consumer spending. Not having society spend hurts the growth of the economy. Another example of the purpose of the government is taking care of…

Example #2

The role of government in our society cannot be overemphasized and the government as a seat of authority where rules and laws are established adjusted and executed has been in existence since time immemorial. In various sectors of the society, the government has an important role to play starting from the law-making, education, industrialization, technology, transportation, social amenities development, job creation, health sector, etc.

Every day when we turn on the news, we discover that what it contains consists of what governments around the world are doing.

It seems that if we didn’t have governments to amuse us, there would be no news at all. In fact, without the beneficence of government, life might become so boring as to not be worth living at all. Even with all this talk about government, it is amazing that the population, in general, does not have a clear idea of what government is and what they do. When people are asked what the purpose of government is, or what the essence of a government enterprise is, they frequently shrug their shoulders.

The term government, like so many other terms we use daily, is taken for granted and is poorly defined at best. In the modern world, we can see that society is the government itself, and society governs itself. The democratic form of governance has been accepted by almost the entire world in modern times. The first accepted form of leadership and governance was that of tribal leaders, followed by monarchy and democracy. The term society is quite a heavy, important, and is almost synonymous to the terms of mankind and human existence.

Example #3

Philosophers have struggled with determining the proper role of government. In the absence of government and laws, people could do whatever they wanted, and some of them would try to slaughter others and steal their property. This is the state called anarchy. People have realized that the safety of the people and the country would be in jeopardy in such a state.

Thus, it is necessary for a country to have a government and/or ruler. However, a ruler must not have absolute power nor a lack of authority. But the protection of the people and the country alone is not enough for a country to prosper. The property and the natural rights of the people and the government must also be protected. Thus, the proper role of government is to protect the…

If a ruler lacks power, he would not be able to fulfill his duty of protecting his people’s welfare. If the weak ruler is overthrown by rebels, the country would return to the brutish state of Anarchy. Thus, a ruler is only legitimate to rule if he has the willingness and the ability to protect the people, their property, and their rights. Having willingness means when the ruler has power, he is willing to use that power to serve his people instead of his own interests.

Having ability means that the ruler has enough authority to be able to protect the people, their rights, etc. If a ruler has the willingness and ability, he will gain the people’s loyalty and support. In the “Mandate of Heaven,” a ruler got legitimacy only if he could untie the people and overthrow the previous ruler. “Heaven decides as the people decide.” Heaven approves of a ruler only if the people support him.

Therefore, a ruler is legitimate to rule only if he has the willingness and ability along with the people’s support and loyalty. The role of a government in creating order in society is to establish a set of laws to protect the people, their…

Example #4

The thing that separates a government from any other civic or social organization is that governments may legally Initiate the use of force. Only the government has this power, which Is called the police power. And politics Is nothing more than deciding how this power should be used. That’s why, when Chairman Mao Sedona said, “All political power comes from the barrel of a gun,” he was not philosophizing or speaking in the abstract. He was stating a basic axiom. Bear that in mind.

Any time you elect a legislator, mayor, or other government officials, you are hiring them to hold and use a gun on the people, including yourself.

They may not do so directly, but anyone with the power to pass laws or write regulations has the power to decide when the police should come after you. And “you are disobeying a law” Is always a reason enough. Government Is the same thing, only in groups. The point of having a government is to organize force for the defense of a group or community (be it a neighborhood, a town, a city, a state, or a nation).

And the government is us. So at what point does it become justice for the government to do by force that which it is unjust for us to do by force?

And they do not care whether it is an autocracy, an oligarchy, a democracy, a spot, or a republic except for those who want to use the police power to compel others to do their will. If we are going to have a Just society, we must limit government to its core functions: protection of life, protection of liberty, protection of property, punishing those who transgress those rights and gaining restitution from them for their victims. First of all, usually, only the government is expected to provide some urban infrastructure, fundamental services, basic calamitousness like electricity, boreholes, hospitals, good roads, etc.

People pay the tax to bring the government to come into existence and maintain its operation. Therefore, they deserve to get all services which are provided by the government. Authorities could require the inhabitants to join the army when the nation’s interest is seriously threatened, for example, in order to protect its country. Politicians could also send troops to protect people when emergency situations occur: tsunami, floods, and forest fires, to name but a few. However, it is more likely that the government should only pay attention to some services and let the citizens take part in developing the country.

To begin with, it is generally believed that it would be a waste of money if the government had to engage a wide range of services. A lot of people would be employed in order to operate these businesses, meaning that people would have to pay more and more taxes. Furthermore, it is often claimed that the quality of services that are provided by democracies is not as high as expected. As a consequence of this, it would be wise to encourage private companies to join the market and provide some services which do not relate to national security such as entertainment, arts, and so on.

Secondlyџoverspent as rule-maker or law-maker and umpire. The need for government in these respects arises because absolute freedom is impossible. However attractive anarchy may be as a philosophy, it is not feasible in a world of imperfect men. Men’s freedoms can conflict, and when they do, one man’s freedom must be limited to preserve another’s as a Supreme Court Justice once put it, “My freedom to move my fist must be limited by the proximity of your chin. “let is important to distinguish the day-to-day activities of people from the generally customary and legal framework within which these take place.

The day-to-day activities are like the actions of the participants in a game when they are playing it; the framework, like the rules of the game they play. And Just as a good game requires acceptance by the players both of the rules and of the umpire to interpret and enforce them, so a good society requires that its members agree on the general conditions that will govern relations among them, on some means of arbitrating different interpretations of these conditions, and on some device for enforcing compliance with the generally accepted rules.

In both games and society also, no set of rules can prevail unless most participants most of the time conform to them without external sanctions; unless that is, there is a broad underlying social consensus. But we cannot rely on custom or on this consensus alone to interpret and to enforce the rules; we need an umpire. These then are the basic roles of government in a free society: to provide a means whereby we can modify the rules, to mediate differences among us on the meaning of the rules, and to enforce compliance with the rules on the part of those few who would otherwise not play the game.

The major problem in deciding the freedoms of different individuals. In some cases, the answer is easy. There is little difficulty in attaining near unanimity to the proposition that one man’s freedom to ruder his neighbor must be sacrificed to preserve the freedom of the other man to live. In other cases, the answer is difficult. In the economic area, a major problem arises in respect of the conflict between freedom to combine and freedom to compete. What meaning is to be attributed to “free” as modifying “enterprise”?

In the United States, “free” has been understood to mean that anyone is free to set up an enterprise, which means that existing enterprises are not free to keep out competitors except by selling a better product at the same price or the same product at a lower price. In the continental tradition, on the other hand, the meaning has generally been that enterprises are free to do what they want, including the fixing of prices, division of markets, and the adoption of other techniques to keep out potential competitors.

Perhaps the most difficult specific problem in this area arises with respect to combinations among laborers, where the problem of freedom to combine and freedom to compete is particularly acute. The role of government is to defend our lives, our liberty, and our property, from those who would violate them, and to punish those who do so by making them pay us restitution. When a government limits itself to this, people are pleased with it, to the very limited extent that they have to think about it at all.

And they do not care whether it is an autocracy, an oligarchy, a democracy, a despot, or a republic, except for those who want to use the police power to compel others to do their will. Thirdly, the relevance of government in the development of a society cannot be over-emphasized as it is very important particularly in the economy. Apart from the fact that the government regulates all the economic activities in the country, they are also in charge of instructing the central bank which is the apex bank in any country when to mint money and when to regulate the amount of money in circulation by their control activities.

Thus, doing this they are making the economy grow which is one of the most important aims of the government of any country whether developed countries or developing countries. Also, the Government responsible for the monetary system has long been recognized. It is explicitly provided for in the constitutional provision which gives Congress the power “to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin. There is probably no other area of economic activity with respect to which government action has been so uniformly accepted.

This habitual and by now almost unthinking acceptance of governmental responsibility makes a thorough understanding of the grounds for such responsibility all the more necessary since it enhances the danger that the scope of government will spread from activities that are, to those that are not, appropriate in a free society, from providing a monetary framework to determining the allocation of resources among individuals.

Therefore, the organization of economic activity through voluntary exchange presumes that we have provided, through government, for the maintenance of law and order to prevent coercion of one individual by another, the enforcement of contracts voluntarily entered into, the definition of the meaning of property rights, the interpretation and enforcement of such rights, and the provision of a monetary framework.

Another important relevance of government in security it gives to children, the less privileged (action through government on the paternalistic ground)as embedded in the constitution. Without these securities, it will be difficult for any society to develop. We have seen cases of child abuse through rapes, molestations, etc. They attain a level of freedom that makes it difficult for their rights to be traumatized because they are protected “sort off’ and it is backed up n the laws of the society or in the constitution.

All these are the essential roles the government does to develop their respective societies. We do not believe in freedom for madmen or children. The necessity of drawing a line between responsible Individuals and others is inescapable, yet it means that there is an essential ambiguity in our ultimate objective of freedom. Paternalism is inescapable for those “homo we designate as not responsible. The clearest case, perhaps, is that of madmen.

We are willing neither to permit them freedom nor to shoot them. It would be nice if we could rely on the voluntary activities of individuals to house and care for the madmen. But I think we cannot rule out the possibility that such charitable activities Nil be inadequate, if only because of the neighborhood effect involved in the fact that I benefit if another man contributes to the care of the insane. For this reason, we may be willing to arrange for their care through the government.

Lilied offers a more difficult case. The ultimate operative unit in our society is the family, not the individual. Yet the acceptance of the family as the unit rests in considerable part on expediency rather than principle. We believe that parents are generally best able to protect their children and to provide for their development into responsible Individuals for whom freedom is appropriate. But we do not believe in the freedom of parents to do what they will with other people.

The children are responsible individuals in embryo, and a believer in freedom believes in protecting their ultimate rights. There is no avoiding the need for some measure of paternalism. As A. V Dicey rote in 1914 about an act for the protection of mental defectives, “The Mental Deficiency Act is the first step along a path on which no sane man can decline to enter, but which, if too far pursued, will bring statesmen across difficulties hard to meet without considerable interference with individual liberty.

Lastly, one of the most important relevant governments plays in the development of any society is n the educational sector. The government of every society or country makes cautious efforts to make sure that the educational sector does not lag behind. Because they believe that children are the leaders of tomorrow, it is known worldwide that they need sound education to build a developed society and to foster growth generally and be up there among the top nations of the world.

The role of government cannot be overemphasized in this aspect because of the role that education particularly plays in the development of the societies, if we were to look at the top nations of the Nor we would see that they have great historical backgrounds, so the government of every society or government know they have a lot of work to do to develop their captives societies by the establishment of primary or elementary, secondary or high schools and above all tertiary institutions like universities.

That is the major reason why a lot of government institutions provide free education for its citizens. Education is a very important tool for governments seeking to maintain the status quo. Also, it is generally accepted that the government should control the be so controlled. ) Thomas Jefferson, although opposed to big government in general, Nas in favor of public education: “If the people don’t have enough information to Meld power correctly, don’t take the power from them.

Give them the information! ” His advocacy of public education was probably quite innocent and well-intentioned, but we must remember that Hitler also called for a government monopoly on education In conclusion, it cannot be denied that the government’s role in providing services for the society is very important; however, it would be essential for private groups to take part in providing some quality services.

Politicians should Inspire more and more individuals or groups to take part in developing the country. CONCLUSION. The relevance of government in the development of any society cannot be overemphasized due to the different tasks they perform which ordinarily cannot be performed by individuals. A government which maintained law and order, provide the basic amenities like building hospitals, schools, boreholes, roads, etc.

Fined property rights, served as a means whereby we could modify property rights and other rules of the economic game, adjudicated disputes about the interpretation of the rules, enforced contracts, promoted competition, provided a monetary framework, readily regarded as sufficiently important and which supplemented private charity ND the private family in protecting the irresponsible, whether madman or child Important to Justify the roles of government in the development of societies, such a government would clearly have important functions to perform.

Example #5

“The purpose of government”, as Thomas Jefferson said, “is to allow for the preservation of life and liberty, and the pursuit of happiness Government cannot give life, it cannot give liberty, and it cannot give happiness; it can only take such things away. Liberty, or freedom, is a topic that arises in any discussion concerning government; and it arises, not because the government can contribute to freedom, in any way, but rather because government invariably, due to its very nature, intrudes on freedom”.

The government is to be treated like a trained guard dog, to be led out into the crowd by its handlers under strict control and sharp command. Usually, the mere presence of Government power is enough to remind people to leave the liberty of others alone so that each person, unfettered in any way except by proper law, through individual choice, might create wealth; and to use it or preserve it, as they should choose. Only the individual, each in his own way, can create wealth; and by individuals doing this does the wealth of the nation come about.

The wealth thus comes about because people have the freedom to choose, in every instance, what they individually calculate is best for them; the trillions of individual decisions that freely occur every day in our economy is what keeps us all going. To maintain an environment in which exchanges between people, within the law, voluntarily occur: this, if the goal is to increase the store of wealth in the country is the sole function of government. It is there to punish the citizen who intrudes on the freedom of another, government’s role is as a referee, it must stay clear of the play; it must leave the business of creating wealth to those who can do it, to those that can only do it, to that outside of government. The government cannot create wealth it can only destroy it.

Corruption in government is a big problem in my eyes the unlawful use of a person’s position while in power leads to multiple problems with today’s government. The corrupt methods politicians use are ideas that are strictly in place for personal gain. Present throughout history and still prevalent within today’s world, government corruption has consisted of a number of negative issues including bribery, economic and social impacts, and the misuse of power. The government’s role within daily life has been shown to have negative effects as seen in many aspects of life as well as in literature.

Bribery can be defined as when one is offered money or some other incentive with the intention to corrupt a person’s actions. Bribery is the main component, if not the basis, of government corruption. Payments made to officials come into play often so people can receive what they desire, causing many negative effects. “The high cost of dealing with state officials through bribery induces many firms to operate the informal sector and many others to underreport sales, costs, and payroll to the authorities”. The bribes negatively resulted in companies having to lie to cover up their bribes. Bribes also have to do with personal gain and the want of certain perks.

These bribes can be as simplistic as money or a larger perk such as an expensive item. The bigger the benefit, the bigger the bribe ends up being. Other perks include election rights. Politicians will pay to have electorates vote for them when they feel they’re chances of winning are low. This corruption affects the trust of the public and threatens the safety of the nation. Each act of corruption from a public servant can have extenuating results reaching far beyond those initially involved in the offense. Most officials who serve the public strive to enhance the lives of Americans, but several make choices to go against the law because of unethical motives. These reasons usually include assembling a larger bank account for themselves or their families.

There are many different types of government and some of the most popular are democracy, monarchy, and communists,for example democracy throughout history different types of instrumental systems have been in tact so civilizations remained structured and strong. As humanity advanced, governments happily followed. Although there have been hiccups from ancient times to modern-day, one type of government, democracy, has proven to be the most effective and adaptive.

As quoted by Winston Churchill, democracy is the best form of government that has existed. This is true because the heart of democracy is reliant, dependent, and thrives on the people of the country desires; which gives them the ability for maintaining the right to choose, over time it adjusts and fixes itself to engulf the prominent troubling issues, and people have the right of electing the person they want or favor. The party most suited to the demographic concerned, are the ones voted in.

Moreover, instating the right to choose also controls the incentive for people to speak out against an unruly leader. When a large mass of civilians disagrees or is concerned with a party’s placing of policies, they can extract their title from them. Just because a party is elected, does not mean that they will remain in power for the entire duration originally allotted to them. The presence of foreseeable change is crucial to a society’s degree of satisfaction associated with its current governmental system. Alteration gives democracy the upper hand.

For example, in Spain in 1982, when Prime Minister Leopoldo Calvo Sotelo completely terminated the party that supported what the people wanted, the people in office forcibly made him resign. Finally, democracy is the best form of government thus far because it is vulnerable to change. The role of high courts and equal rights makes change possible. For example, if the majority impedes a minority groups’ rights, over time, the legislature will adjust, enumerating those who were previously attacked. Overall, democracy makes the necessary refinements needed to keep up with societal developments.

Monarchy The institution of Monarchy is the product of history and this was a popular form till the nineteenth century. In the twentieth century, the absolute monarchy has been abolished in many countries of the world and it exists only in a few countries. Its reason is that modern age is the age of democracy and there is no place for absolute Monarchy in it. Where there is Monarchy, it is a changed form and instead of being absolute, it has become constitutional. Monarchy represents that form of government where the source of all political authority is to be found in a supreme ruler.

The Monarch enjoys a life-long tenure and the office passes to his heirs according to the law of primogeniture which also means firstborn. When the monarch is the nominal head of the State and the real powers of the State are exercised by others, the government is an Aristocracy or a Democracy instead of a Monarchy. In a limited monarchy, the authority of a monarch is limited either by prescriptions of a written constitution or by certain fundamental conventions. In a limited monarchy, the king is only a nominal ruler and the cabinet enjoys real executive powers. It is responsible to the Parliament for its activities.

Another most common government is communist, a system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single often authoritarian party holds power; state controls are imposed with the elimination of private ownership of property or capital while claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.

No one person shall be ranked higher than another and there is to be one person in charge of the society in a communist government. There are still to this day many countries that fall under the rule of communism and the ways they were transformed under communist rule are quite interesting.

Example #6 – Writing Workshop