The life given by god has a very special meaning a value in which people sometimes forget to thank or either regret. Many students/adults believe that they are going to be popular if they have money and a good job buy forget that people are influenced by those who have learned something. Also, a lot fails to remember, to earn the value you must earn it.
In today’s economy, the government creates value on the person by looking at the position they are held for. If you look at it from society’s point of view they believe people should be given value according to what they do and what position they are. From an individual’s perspective, they judge themselves on what they accomplish and achieve.
Each individual has their own perspective on how they want their life to be. As Steve Jobs mentioned in his inaugural speech “ Don’t let the noise of others’ opinions drown out your inner voice”(89). The meaning of this quote just does what you love and do not let anyone else tell you what to do. In life, you just have to be your own self and believe that you can and will achieve. Your life will only be worth it if you actually accomplish something you wanted to do not what others want you to do. Several high school students tend to find a job while attending school and stay with it for the rest of their life.
However, what they do not realize is that they are missing out on what they actually wanted to do in life not make money with the job they hate doing. The value of life has to be interpreted throughout high school as well as college because if you do not figure it out then you will end up doing something you will regret in the future.
In many cases, society would make their decision based on what the person did and who the person was. For example, in the late 18th-19th century when there was slavery the people made their decision based on who had the most money, not the one who worked. If you look at it today it is kind of similar because say a teacher gets injured and a professional athlete the value would be based on…
Example #2 – The Value Of Life In Blade Runner
Blade Runner is not your traditional science fiction movie. It is more or of a drama. The movie brings up so many important issues. One of which is the value of life and the importance of making the most of what you have got.
Blade Runner is set in 2019. In 2019 replicates (clones) have been made to absolute perfection. Deckard and the alike live in a world where you aren’t sure of what is real and what is not. In the end, you would even question yourself if you were real.
Blade Runner is about the value of life and the importance of making the most of what you’ve got. The replicas in the movie want to exist. They have a need for life. Roy (Batty) begs Tyrell for the life he says and I quote “I want more life, fucker.
The replicates in Blade Runner are said to be
“The light that burns twice as bright burns half as long… …and you have burned so very, very brightly, Roy.”
“It’s too bad she won’t live! But then again, who does?”
Values are qualities that one considers to be worthwhile and as such, act as the driving force in their lives. A person’s values take precedence over other qualities and therefore dictate the manner in which an individual may act in particular instances. In my life, I have a number of values that I hold dear.
These values are as a result of my upbringing, my principles in life as well as my socialization. In this essay, I shall identify the core values that I hold and the manner in which they influence my everyday choices, actions, and plans that I make.
One of the educational values that are fundamental to me is an achievement. This is as a result of my belief that what defines me most as a person is my determination to succeed and my desire to make a positive contribution to society through my career.
Achievement is therefore one of the values that are most important to me since, in today’s world, achievement and success are mostly tied together with educational success. As a result of this, I hold my educational exploits in high esteem since education is one of the avenues where one’s determination leads to quantifiable success.
I greatly value close relationships with my friends and constantly seek to cement the same. This is because good friends can assist one achieve his/her goals in life and can sometimes even be closer than family. For this reason, I invest a lot of time and effort into my close friends.
I make it a priority to be a part of the significant moments in my friends’ lives such as their birthdays, wedding days, and even baby christening ceremonies. In addition to this, I always ensure that I inquire as to their well beings periodically.
Growth and personal development for me is a very fundamental value and its importance in my life cannot be understated. It is my belief that my life is not worth much if I do not strive to constantly improve on my achievements as well as in becoming a better person.
This value of personal growth and development greatly impacts my day to day living especially when it comes to establishing new relations. It is generally my rule that if a new relationship will not add any value to my life, then I should not waste my time exploring it.
One of the constant realities in human life is that we will always be surrounded by needy people. As such, on a social level, I always strive to give my services to the less fortunate. In my opinion, a life well-lived is one that is lived in such a way that it makes a difference to someone else’s life.
This is the philosophy with which I have led my life up to this point and at all times, I try to make a difference in the lives of the people that surround me. Helping other people is therefore a value that I value not only in myself but also in other people.
While modern-day living has somewhat lead to a degradation of the value of family from what it used to be in gone years, I still hold the value of family to be very important in my life. To me, one’s family members are the ones who will stand by you no matter the situation and encourage you through life’s troubles.
While I reckon that family may not always be supportive or as ideal as I envision it, in my experience my family is closely knit and always stands up for me. I therefore always have my family in mind when making my decisions and consider how my actions will affect them. In addition to this, I try to seek guidance from members of the family who are more experienced than I am before making monumental decisions in my life.
It has been argued that honest men and women are a dying breed. This statement holds true in our capitalistic society where profits and personal gains are the primary objectives. The means by which one goes to achieve success is often overlooked and as such, the ends justify the means.
Even in the midst of such an environment, I still hold honesty as one of my core values. Without a doubt, this is mostly as a result of my upbringing whereby honest was applauded and dishonesty shunned. Also, I have come to realize that when one achieves success through honesty, the level of satisfaction that comes with it is truly unrivaled by any other feeling.
Owing to my upbringing, I have huge regard for religion. As such, one of my spiritual values in engaging myself in some religious organization. While it is true that most of my religious values are a result of my upbringing, I have over time come to embrace them as my own and therefore make it my personal duty to be actively involved in my religious organization.
To me, this brings about a sense of balance and helps me be more reflective and appreciative of my life. My religious values impact on my decision making since I try not to make choices that are contrary to my religious beliefs.
In this paper, I have identified some of the values that I hold dear to me. I have also identified how these values impact the choices that I make as well as the actions that I take. From this deep exploration of my values, I have come to the realization that my values greatly dictate how I treat the people around me as well as how I prioritize matters. I believe that as a result of my values, I strive harder to achieve the things that I want in life and as such, I am a better person as a result of them.
Have you ever been asked a question with such an obvious answer, that you just want to shout it at the person who asked you, and scold them for asking such a stupid question? I am sure we have all had one of these moments, and this essay is a more tame response to what, at first glance, seems to be one of those questions. The question is, does life have value? Now you might be thinking, “Come on people, that’s like asking if the water is wet!”.
You might be right about that if you don’t think too hard, but this is a much deeper question. Sure life is definitely valuable, but how do we measure that value? Is every life equally valuable or are certain people more valuable than others? If all life is worth the same amount, what amount is it? Although life is obviously valuable, there really is no way to ascertain that value due to the insane amount of variables.
Although anyone would agree that life is valuable, there is no unanimously agreed on a method to actually calculate this value. However, it is still necessary to calculate this value as there must be a limit to how much we are willing to compensate families for their losses. Ike Brannon agrees with this assertion in his essay What is a life worth.
“Because society has limited resources that it can spend on health and safety improvements, it should obtain the greatest benefit for each dollar spent, and ascertaining an appropriate value is necessary to that effort.” (Brannon 60). Brannon states that society has a limited supply of resources, and we should only spend an amount that will benefit us, even in the case of human life.
The problem is, there are many methods to calculate this amount, but none of them are completely agreed upon. Some of them take into account a person’s income, and others may calculate using the relative danger of a person’s job. There are too many algorithms used by too many organizations so if become s impossible to actually answer the question of how much life is truly worth.
In stark contrast to the views expressed by Brannon, Kenneth Feinberg believes that all lives are equal and to calculate their value based on income is discrimination and unethical. Does the state this in his article What is the value of human life?
“Courtrooms, judges, lawyers, and juries are not the answer when it comes to public compensation. I have resolved my personal conflict and have learned a valuable lesson at the same time. I believe that public compensation should avoid financial distinctions which only fuel the hurt and grief of the survivors. I believe all lives should be treated the same.” (Feinberg 85).
Feinberg is basically stating the opposite of Ike Brannon’s opinion. He believes that all lives are of equal value regardless of economic standing. However, people who agree with this stance need to ask themselves one question. Would you pay the same amount to save a random homeless person or a close friend of yours?
Obviously, the vast majority of people would be willing to give up more money to save a friend’s life. This means that different lives are worth different amounts to different people. It would be difficult to argue that a random homeless person’s life is worth the same amount as that of the President of the United States.
Another angle to the question of “Is life valuable?” is whether is worth it to continue living a life full of pain and suffering. This question is addressed in Hamlet’s soliloquy. But that the dread of something after death, “The undiscovered country, from whose bourn border No traveler returns, puzzles the will, 25 And makes us rather bear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all, And thus the native hue of resolution natural color Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought, 30 And enterprise of great pitch and moment With this regard their currents turn awry” (Shakespeare 66). Here, Hamlet asserts that it is better to live with suffering because at least you know you’re alive.
There is no way to know what will happen to you post-mortem, so it is much more advantageous to just stick with what you know. I only partly agree with this statement. It is advantageous to continue living through suffering not because death is uncertain but because it is enough to simply be alive for me.
It is better to feel sadness and pain than to feel nothing at all. Dead people little more than inanimate objects. They no longer function as living things. I want to avoid being that for as long as I possibly can. Even if life is filled with pain and suffering.
Life is valuable no matter how you slice it. However, that value is different for different people. Some believe that the value of life should be measured by income, and others believe every life is worth an equal amount. I believe the value of a life should be measured by a person’s contributions to society.
Your life is worth what you have done to help out your fellow human being. And, it is more advantageous to continue living as long as you possibly can even if you are experiencing pain and suffering because no matter what, you are still alive and able to feel these things. Life always has value, there is just no objective way to figure it out.
Human life is full of meaning. As humans, we assign value to many things. However, what happens when we assign a specific value to human life? This is the issue being presented in the article, “What is a Life Worth,” by Amanda Ripley. The government is determining a monetary value to human life, and it does not appeal to the masses. There are many problems with the cold calculation, and most people cannot see the other side of the numbers.
The economic value of human life is calculated based on the income the person was receiving, but when the check is given to a loved one of a small amount, the compensation is misinterpreted as an overall value of human life. The true value of human life should not be combined with the monetary value that is determined by the government, or the value of life would be worth very little.
In the article, “What is a Life Worth,” by Amanda Ripley, the families of the tragic 9/11 incident were economically compensated for the loss of their loved ones. This calculation was determined by the income the person had been receiving prior to the tragedy. The goal of the government monetary compensation was to provide a more stable economic situation for the families that depended on these people for the majority income. Ripley interviews a colorful array of people, all of whom had different opinions, especially those who were outraged by the amount they received.
Needless to say, the vast majority blamed the government for an unequal and unjust way of going about the distribution of money, bringing in the actual value of life, rather than the financial compensation. For example, a woman who was killed in the pentagon left no dependants, and therefore her parents were eligible for the money.
The value of human life varies, depending on the person. Even though as humans, we assign a lot of value to many things, human life should remain the most valuable thing we have. The true value of human life should not be combined with the monetary value that is determined by the government, or the value of life would be worth very little.
It is only when a drastic event occurs that we begin to rethink how we live our lives. When people truly believe that their life will come to an end, they cherish every moment and aspect that they experience.
This essay examines three perspectives on the value of life. I will draw from “My Journey Back to Life”, an autobiography by award-winning cyclist Lance Armstrong, “What is a Life Worth?,” a news report by Amanda Ripley, and “Unfinished Business,” an essay by psychiatrist Elizabeth Kubler-Ross.
Lance Armstrong’s autobiography, “My Journey Back to Life” is about living life to the fullest and taking things for granted. Lance Armstrong was an athletic cyclist who spent his life racing on his bike. He has been fighting an ongoing war with big trucks that have hit him many times. Lance Armstrong always figured if he died an untimely death, it would be because some rancher in his Dodge 4×4 ran him headfirst into a ditch.
“One minute you’re pedaling along a highway, and the next minute, boom, you’re face-down in the dirt. A blast of hot air hits you, you taste the acrid, oily exhaust in the roof of your mouth, and all you can do is wave a fist at the disappearing taillights.” (Armstrong, 7). That’s how cancer feels like to Lance Armstrong, like being run off the road by a truck.
Lance Armstrong used to take things for granted because he could endure more physical stress than most people and he doesn’t get tired while doing it. “My illness was humbling and sparkly revealing, and it forced me to survey my life with an unforgiving eye.” (Armstrong, 15). Cancer was the best thing that happened to Lance Armstrong.
Amanda Ripley’s news report,” What is a Life Worth?” is about putting a price tag on lives. Joseph Hewins was a poor workman who was barreled over by a train. Hewins left behind his wife and three children, who were poor even before his death. When his widow sued, she lost at every level. At that time, when a man died, he took his legal claims with him, now the courts started to put a dollar value on a life- after death. “The concept of assigning a price tag to life has always made people intensely squeamish.
After all, isn’t it degrading to presume that money can make a family whole again? And what of the disparities? Is a poor man’s life worth less
than a rich man’s?” (Ripley, 2). On September 11, many people died in an incident. The government is trying to pay victims and their families without placing blame. They sent Kenneth Feinberg to persuade the victims and their families to join the federal Victim Compensation Fund. He told them that the government has agreed to write large checks to victims’ families without any litigation. There were different sums for different families and deductions.
The deductions have the same effect of equalizing the differences in the awards, which critics have called Feinberg’s “Robin Hood Strategy.” “Attitude, to me, is more important than facts. It is more important than the past than education than money than circumstances than failures, than successes, than what other people think or say or do . . . It will make or break a company, a church, a home.” (Ripley, 30). This means that manner, disposition, feeling, position, etc., with regard to a person or thing, is more important than all those things.
The third perspective, “Unfinished Business,” an essay by Elizabeth Kubler-Ross is about a psychiatrist’s experiences and point of view on children that know that they are dying. Elizabeth Kubler-Ross is an expert on issues related to death and dying. She talks about her experiences with dying children, who she says has taught her about life. “I learn always from dying patients. Instead of always looking at the negative, what you see is the uniqueness and strength in every single human being.” (Kubler-Ross, 262).
She talks about a 12-year-old girl who was dying at home. Kubler-Ross helped her and her little brother discover how much they loved each other. “Grief is the most God-given gift to get in touch with your losses.” (Kubler-Ross, 262). Elizabeth Kubler-Ross stresses how much we can learn about life by dealing with death.
In conclusion, life shouldn’t be wasted. You should live out your life to the fullest. Don’t waste it sitting around all the time. Life has no monetary values, it can’t be calculated. Life is valued by love and family relationships that can not be repeated once the person dies.
Life is a journey toward death. Some of the most profound stories about this journey come from people who are close to death and from those people who are close to the dying. Life should be treasured and valued without a price.