The Most Dangerous Game Essay

Example #1

This paper will analyze the short story called “The Most Dangerous Game” by discussing the four main en vs. himself. Rainsford, despite the struggle he faces with the environment, he also faces the problem of handling himself. He keeps on telling himself not to lose his nerve, here he is trying to keep himself on track, and his mind on the task at hand which is staying alive. The thought that he is being hunted like all those animals he once hunted is giving him a false feeling of security. He starts to understand what the animal is feeling. He is placed in the exact shoes as the pray.

PaperHelp.org Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically For You!


Check Price

This paper will analyze the short story called “The Most Dangerous Game” by discussing the four main elements of a short story which are, setting, character, conflict, and theme. The story involves two main characters, Rainsford and General Zaroff. Rainsford is a celebrated hunter, who enjoys hunting animals. He does not believe that hunting animals is wrong until he meets a certain General Zaroff. General Zaroff, is also a man that loves to hunt, but over the years has grown dull with it.

His constant pursuit for bigger and smarter game has come to an end. General Zaroff is devastated because of this, and especially after growing up his whole life with “rifle in hand” and the target in his sights. He decides to take his hunting to a higher level, the hunt for human life, Rainsford’s life! This story takes place in the Caribbean, on a secluded island. The author chose an ideal place for his setting. The story consists of a war between the two main characters, and what better place than an island that has such excellent geographical features to support this struggle.

Some examples are the dense trees, trails, and some quicksand. This setting also makes the two characters display all the skills and tricks they have learned over the years, and then wage war against each other. Does the setting play a sufficient role in the story?s overall development. Without this setting, the story would not reveal the game of “cat and mouse” which is going on. The setting holds the bulk of the action in it, the story has characters hiding in trees, falling in quicksand, and by being led into traps. Not using this setting in the story would make the story miss out on its excitement and suspense.

The next few paragraphs will introduce the characters and will provide a psychological profile of them. Some observations will also be made on the relative importance of the element of character in the story?s development. Beginning with the characters which play a lesser role in the story. Whitney is a man who does not believe in hunting and killing animals, he believe’s that animals understand that there being hunted down and killed.

Whitney’s main importance in the story is that the author uses him as a “tool”, to help us understand the personality and beliefs Rainsford has. Rainsford is the central character in the story. Rainsford on the other hand does not have the same beliefs that Whitney has. He loves hunting so much that he does not stop to think whether or not the animals have any feelings or emotions. Bluntly he does not care if the animals feel anything.

Rainsford philosophy is that the world is made up of two classes -?the hunters and the hunters.? Rainsford has never felt what it is like to be hunted because he has always been the predator. That is sure to change as the story unfolds and takes a classic twist, wherein this case the hunter Rainsford becomes the hunted. Rainsford also proves to be a developing character in the story. Rainsford does this by stating in the latter part of the story that he now understands how the animals feel when they are being hunted.

The character General Zaroff is a very complex character because he has two sides to himself. One side portrays a well educated, polite, hospitable man. On the other side, General Zaroff portrays a very cunning cold-blooded killer. Killer in the sense that he hunts humans for pleasure, and does not feel any remorse for them. Which is the result, as mentioned before, of his boredom towards hunting just animals. General Zaroff has the same views as Whitney, in the sense that humans and animals are equal.

The difference being, General Zaroff believes killing an animal is the same as killing a man. The character Ivan, known as General Zaroffs servant, does not play a big part in the story. However, we know Ivan is General Zaroffs, right-hand man. Ivan is considered a savage in the story, which would make it easy for someone like General Zaroff to control. Although, Ivan should be considered the main asset to General Zaroff, for he is the General?s alternative for the captive’s who choose not to play the General?s lethal game. The major conflicts in the story are Man vs. Man, Man vs. Environment, and Man vs. Himself.

The conflict Man vs. Environment is portrayed when Rainsford is set out into the jungle to fend for himself while being hunted. His only defense is a hunting knife that General Zaroff supplied him with. With minimal firepower, Rainsford uses his environment to help him overcome the obstacle which lays ahead, (General Zaroff). By setting traps in the jungle he is able to show General Zaroff that he is not going to layover and die. In the second part of the conflict, there is much conflict is man vs. man. It is the most important because Rainsford and General Zaroff battle one another throughout the story. It all begins when Rainsford falls off his boat and swam to the nearest island, which was the island where General Zaroff was located.

This is where the conflict begins. All of a sudden Rainsford starts to understand what Whitney was trying to get across to him at the beginning, which was to put yourself in the animal’s shoes before just speculating and guessing how they feel. The friendship which was started when the two men met, slowly evaporates. Rainsford starts to see that General Zaroff is psychotic, and that he plans to send him out as soon as possible. Obviously Rainsford does not want anything to do with Zaroff’s plan.

This is when they “bash heads” once again. General Zaroff leaves him no choice but to hit the jungle and survive the three days, without getting killed. His other alternative is to fight big bad Ivan. Don’t think so!! The battle of who is the best hunter is on. General Zaroff believes he is the best hunter and wants to prove to himself that he can even hunt down and kill the well known Rainsford. He starts getting frustrated when Rainsford slowly kills off his assistant Ivan, one of his top dogs, and injures Zaroff.

Right then you get the feeling that General Zaroff is starting to appear a little frightened, and that he is starting to run out of resources to track down Rainsford. After he loses the dog he becomes a coward and yells out into the jungle that he will be back with the rest of his hounds.

Zaroff proves that he does not have the guts to take on Rainsford one on one. In the end, Rainsford outsmarts the General and ends up killing him. After Rainsford had thought that killing humans was crazy, he just does it. It is justified in this case because of the situation that the General put him in. The element of conflict is huge in this story.

Without the conflict, Rainford just lands on the Island and then just turns around and goes home. But the conflict restrains Rainsford to stay on the island and suffer like all the animals he has hunted in his lifetime. The theme of the story is essential, in the sense that it portrays many different aspects of human moral.

The author shows us this by giving Whitney, Rainsford, and Zaroff totally different views on what is morally correct and incorrect. For example, the innocence of Whitney compared to the extreme madness of General Zaroff. And Rainsford who believes a little bit of both. The writer’s other purpose in the story is to show us that if you do not walk a mile in another man’s shoes, you cannot comprehend how they feel, you can only speculate.

In conclusion, I really enjoyed the story, and how Richard Connell guided us through the different levels of human moral of each character. I also liked how he displayed that if you put yourself in someone else’s shoes, it can change your whole outlook on a certain issue.

 

Example #2

The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell is about the hunter and the hunted but later in the story it becomes ironic because it turns into a game where the hunter becomes the hunted. It turns into a chase of competition and of survival.

Two sailors Rainsford and his partner Whitney sailed into the darkness of the of sea. Their purpose was to hunt, they called it the ” greatest sport”. They were hunters and headed to the Amazon to hunt vicious animals such as Jaguars and tigers.

They sailed to an island called “Ship-Trap Island”. Sailors feared this island and had a curious dread of such a scary place. The sky was filled with darkness when suddenly he heard Three gunshots that were fired and heard them again and again. Then he heard a scream while smoking a pipe when suddenly the pipe fell and as he tried to reach for it he went down into the sea where the waves swallowed his screams.

Nobody could have heard him as the ocean swallowed his screams and the only chance of survival was to swim. Rainsford swam towards the screams and ended up in the Island. He walked on the shoreline and later found a place that looked like a mansion. There he met General Zaroff who bought the island to hunt. He was indeed a sportsman who invented a new sensation of the hunting game.

His game was to train those men whose ships were wrecked and ended up in that island, and then provide them with food and a knife for three days. Once they were trained they were led out into the island as a head start while Zaroff chase after them and tried to hunt them down. If They survived during those three days they had won the game and they were let free but in the other case if they were found they were killed.

Zaroff never lost the game so if one of the men being hunted was about to survive he would release the hounds to chased after them. Rainsford rested and the next morning had a dispute with Zaroff and told him that this hunting style was too brutal. In this argument Zaroff got mad and at this point in the story, Rainsford became the hunted. He was let loose into the island where he was to prepare himself for the most dangerous game of his life, the survival of the fittest.

The first night was panicking and worried Rainsford as he hid on top of a tree. The next day he set up a trap but Zaroff didn’t fall for it and he almost got caught when Zaroff was right next to the bushes were Rainsford was hiding. the last day he set up a pitfall and while Zarroff and his servant were searching, his servant, unfortunately, fell into the pit. Rainsford got out of the Island trying to escape by swimming out into the ocean and swam back to the mansion and when Zaroff returned Rainsford switched the game around and proposed him to become the hunted.

I like this short story because Rainsford was wise in making traps wich allowed Zaroff to take more time trying to find him and did them successfully which helped him survive those three days. I also liked how the story ended it was kind of ironic the way Rainsfored changed the game around and became the hunter and Zaroff became the hunted. I thought it was a good idea because this way Zaroff would realize that his game of hunting people was wrong and this would teach him a lesson.

 

Example #3 – Conflict In The Most Dangerous Game

“The Most Dangerous Game” is a bizarre hunting story. In this story, General Zaroff hunts Rainsford. Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game” included many types of conflict, such as the following: Rainsford versus nature, Rainsford versus himself, and Rainsford versus General Zaroff.

The first type of external conflict, Rainsford versus nature, was portrayed many times in the story. While Rainsford was on the ship with his friend Whitney, he had an encounter with the bad weather and the “moist black velvet night.” When Rainsford fell into the ocean, he had a tough battle with the water. Rainsford barely had enough energy to swim to Ship-Trap Island. Another external conflict transpired when Rainsford was in the jungle trying to outlast General Zaroff for three day, Rainsford had to deal with the scorching heat. Being in the jungle, Rainsford also had to deal with numerous kinds of insects and animals. The battle between Rainsford and nature was difficult; nevertheless, Rainsford did not surrender.

In addition to Rainsford’s struggle with nature, he also had struggles within himself. When in the ocean, he went through another type of internal conflict; Rainsford had to stop panicking or he would have drowned. He became coolheaded and realized his clothes were not helping his strokes so he “wrestled out of his clothes.” Rainsford also kept a cool head when Ivan was pointing a pistol at him, Rainsford knew he had to keep his composure or Ivan would fire away.

Another type of internal conflict that Rainsford went through was when General Zaroff?s told him about hunting men; Rainsford contemplated within himself of whether he should or should not attack General Zaroff. An equally important internal conflict occurred during the three days that Rainsford was in the jungle; Connell used conflict when Rainsford kept telling himself “I will not lose my nerve. I will not” (Connell 20).

While Rainsford was on the tree and General Zaroff was below, Rainsford had to struggle within himself not to make a single noise or move a muscle. Instead of getting some much-needed rest, Rainsford had to fight himself to keep going. Since Rainsford was a prolific hunter, he used his intelligence to keep the focus of the task at hand.

The most important external conflict was between Rainsford and the inhumane General Zaroff. Rainsford was given hunting clothes, food, and a knife to survive to the midnight of the third day. Rainsford could have also clashed with Ivan, but Rainsford was frightened of Ivan. Rainsford’s conflict with General Zaroff lasted three days. Rainsford outsmarted General Zaroff to a degree when he came up with a fake trail for General Zaroff to follow.

Also, Rainsford tried to defeat General Zaroff by making a Burmese tiger pit, but General Zaroff did not fall for the trap. By killing Ivan with the knife, Rainsford’s battle with General Zaroff was almost on an even playing field. At the end of the third day in General Zaroff?s room, the two men had their final brawl. Rainsford said, “I am still a beast at bay,? ?Get ready, General Zaroff” (Connell 23). The victor of this external conflict was Rainsford.

Finally, in “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell, Rainsford conquered nature, himself, and General Zaroff to survive. From swimming with all his energy to keeping himself calm to killing General Zaroff, Rainsford went through it all. The different types of conflict in “The Most Dangerous Game” were essential literary tactics to create the mystery of this magnificent short story.

 

Example #4

“The Most Dangerous Game” is a short story authored by Richard Connell published in 1924. It is a story about a hunter becoming the hunted. “The Most Dangerous Game” essay shall provide an analysis of the story. The main character Sanger Rainsford accompanied by his partner Whitney set out on a journey from New York to Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. The two are on a mission to hunt the Jaguar, a big cat in South America.

The play notes here that Rainsford loves hunting to the extent that he calls it the best sport in the world. In the course of their discussion over their ability to hunt wild animals, they are terrified suddenly by gunshots and screams. This occurs at night.

The scare makes Rainsford fall off their boat into the Caribbean Sea in trying to rescue his pipe. The circumstance did not allow him to swim back to the ship. He then swims to an island, which is in the direction that the yells and gunshots had come from. This island also happens to be a Ship-Trap zone. On the Island, Rainsford finds two inhabitants living in a palatial mansion. General Zaroff is the owner of the island and an astute hunter.

The second person is Zaroff’s servant, who is deaf and mute. His name is Ivan. It is surprising that after the introduction, Zaroff has heard of Rainsford from the books he has read about him hunting leopards in Tibet, China. They then have dinner together. Zaroff’s explanation follows this to Rainsford on how he got bored with killing wild animals because the adventure did not bring challenges anymore.

His adventure surprises Rainsford, who, even after persuasion, refused to join. What happens when Rainsford refuses to hunt with Zaroff? Zaroff says that he now captures sailors whose ships are wrecked; he then sends them to the forest with food, dressed in full hunting regalia and a knife. The sailors now become his target and turn to hunt and kill them. Being a determined General, he sets his limits to three days. If by the third day neither Ivan, his hunting dogs nor himself have killed the prey, he lets them go.

However, his hunting skills had never allowed an escape to occur. Rainsford turns down the offer to join the hunting of human beings. Zaroff gives him two options. To become either the next prey to be hunted or Ivan whips him to death. Rainsford chooses the former.

In “The Most Dangerous Game,” dogs and Ivan play an equally significant role in the plot. This is a dangerous game pitting Rainsford on one side and Zaroff’s entire team of Ivan and the dogs on the other side. It is the use of stamina and strength with the show of intelligence. Zaroff makes sure that Rainsford gets the standard treatment of a captive, including giving him food supplies and instructions. The challenge is risky but very intriguing. Rainsford starts by hiding his hunting tactics. He climbs a tree where he is very visible.

This serves to convince Zaroff that Rainsford is easy prey and immediately turns it into the game. The next flow of events proves that Rainsford is a guru in hunting. He sets a trap made of a massive log joined to a tripwire. The first casualty is Zaroff. His shoulder is injured, sending him back to the mansion to sleep. The trap he uses here, he calls it, a Malay man catcher. Day one is done, and Rainsford knows that he has two to go.

His trap on day two killed one of Zaroff’s hounds. This is a trap he nicknames the Burmese tiger pit. The third trap, a native Ugandan knife, kills his servant Ivan. Rainsford then throws himself over the cliff and swims back to the mansion to evade Zaroff. On returning home, the presence of Rainsford in his bed curtains causes Zaroff to salute him. Rainsford refuses this and challenges him for a fight. As the “The Most Dangerous Game” narrative essay shows, he is confident that he can handle him.

Rainsford considers the hunting of human beings as cold blood murder. The general takes the challenge. The challenge affects both whoever loses the duel would be fed to the dogs, and the winner will sleep on Zaroff’s bed. Rainsford expressed that he had never slept on a better bed before. This implies that he killed Zaroff.

“The Most Dangerous Game” essay proves that reading this play, we can see the conflict between man and wild animals. This appears to be acceptable in the story. In the beginning, Rainsford and his partner proudly talk about their experiences in hunting. They are also on a hunting mission to hunt a jaguar. Furthermore, Zaroff, who also explains to Rainsford how he was a good hunter of wild animals before he sorts new challenges, has featured Rainsford in books for his hunting skills as read.

Zaroff introduces the second conflict that is between men. Zaroff launches his new adventure of killing people. He uses his wealth to prove his inhuman actions. He is chasing people to kill them like wild animals. This was, in fact, the cause of his death at the ending of the play.

 

Example #5

There are many different literary devices an author can use to develop a story. They select literary devices to create a plot, set the mood, and build excitement in their story. In Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, he details his protagonist Rainsford, who discovers himself trapped on a Caribbean island. Connell is effective in using the literary devices of foreshadowing and suspense to bring a sense of fear and danger throughout his story.

As Connell begins his story, he uses a conversation between Rainsford and his friend Whitney that foreshadows the main conflict in the story. As Rainsford and Whitney stand on the deck of the yacht, Rainsford explains, “The world is made up of two classes – the hunters and the hunters. Luckily, you and I are the hunters” (1). This use of foreshadowing suggests that the tables will soon be turned on the hunter.

The reader’s thoughts are being prepared for the plot twist to come. Later, Whitney speaks about the island saying, “An evil place can, so to speak, broadcast vibrations of evil” (2). This remark continues to set the mood and tone for more evil events that take place later.

Connell’s use of foreshadowing is effective because it prepares the reader’s mind with a sense of fear and danger that will follow Rainsford on the island. His use of foreshadowing is also effective because it helps to create a mood and conflict in the story.

Author, Richard Connell, continues to bring a sense of fear and danger in his story as he uses suspense to bring excitement and create the mood. Connell draws attention to Rainsford’s courage and determination. While being hunted, Rainsford hopes that he will not lose his courage and strength. This is seen when he breaks for cover before changing hiding places.

This use of suspense enables the reader to sympathize more with Rainsford and recognize the enormous amount of strength needed to survive his situation. The reader comprehends the ongoing effort Rainsford must give to survive.

Another time, Rainsford faces more danger when Ivan and Zaroff hunt him with a pack of vicious dogs. Again, Rainsford escapes by using his clever kills to construct a trap that kills Ivan. As each continuous event becomes more dangerous, it leaves the reader feeling as if nothing could stop the previous event.

Connell’s brilliant use of suspense is effective because it keeps the reader guessing what will happen next and hungry for more until the end of the story. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game”, fear and danger are delivered through his effective use of literary devices foreshadowing and suspense. The mood is created with Connell’s detailed use of foreshadowing and suspense that builds excitement throughout the story.

Connell is effective in proving that the use of literary devices is a necessity in developing a captivating story.

Cite this page

Choose cite format:
The Most Dangerous Game Essay. (2020, Aug 30). Retrieved October 31, 2020, from https://essayscollector.com/examples/the-most-dangerous-game-essay/



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *