Searching for an essay?

Browse the database of more than 4500 essays donated by our community members!

Difference Between Elijah And Elisha Essay

Elijah and Elisha are two of the most famous prophets in the Bible. Elijah is a prophet who was given power by God to control fire, water, and wind. He is known for his mountaintop experience on Mount Carmel where he challenged 450 false prophets of Baal. Elisha is a prophet who was sent to aid Israelite king Jeroboam when there were no other priests left in their land. They’re both great prophets but they have many difference between them that we will discuss in this essay.

Essay 1

Elijah and Elisha’s tale is fascinating. The two were God-appointed prophets who ministered to people and helped them to be saved. The two men are among the most revered prophets in the Old Testament, having served God with faith and trust. Despite their similarities, Elijah and Elisha had several contrasts during their era.


Writing service




[Rated 96/100]

Prices start at $12
Min. deadline 6 hours
Writers: ESL
Refund: Yes

Payment methods: VISA, MasterCard, American Express


[Rated 94/100]

Prices start at $11
Min. deadline 3 hours
Writers: ESL, ENL
Refund: Yes

Payment methods: VISA, MasterCard, American Express, Discover


[Rated 91/100]

Prices start at $12
Min. deadline 3 hours
Writers: ESL, ENL
Refund: Yes

Payment methods: VISA, MasterCard, JCB, Discover

Elijah and Elisha were both prophets called by God to serve the people. They both came from Samaria, so they went through similar life challenges (Elijah and Elisha para. 5). They preached the gospel and saved people’s souls. Their names are quite similar. The names’ pronunciation are similar, despite the fact that they are spelled differently. Another significant similarity between these two men was their miracles, which differ. When Elisha began to serve as a prophet, he performed a miracle exactly like the one Elijah accomplished last.

The secret was using a coat to separate the water of Jordan. They also restored people’s lives while ministering in their ministries, as evidenced by Elijah healing Zerapath and Elisha resurrecting a lady from Shumen. As a result, both prophets performed wonders despite being distinct in nature.

Furthermore, the two prophets had several characteristics in common when it came to their manner of speaking and conveying their message. They spoke and delivered their message in the same way to their kings. Despite these similarities, there were significant differences between them.


They showed no resemblance to each other, despite the fact that they performed miracles. The majority of Elijah’s deeds were intended to bring about death or destruction. Elisha, on the other hand, relied primarily on restoration and healing for his miracles. As a result, Elisha was a prophet of grace while Elijah was a prophet of wrath (Elijah and Elisha para. 5).

Elijah spoke against human corruption and evil, while Elisha’s testimonies were directed toward people’s salvation and preaching about God’s grace. Elijah was sent on a public-facing mission. He frequently engaged with sinners and those who led them astray. Elisha, on the other hand, was mostly concerned with individuals and holy men of God.

He preached and performed miracles through the kindness of God, thus blessing people. Their way of life revealed further distinctions. Elijah’s life was restricted since he avoided interacting with people, but Elisha’s was active. Elisha socialized with a large number of individuals as well as traveled to see his fellow prophets at their learning sites. The manner in which they exercised their ministries varied dramatically. Elijah perished in a fiery chariot accident, while Elisha died in his old age as a result of illness.

Elijah’s first miracle was predicting that for a period of three and a half years, neither rain nor dew would be visible. Elisha’s initial performance was to pray for clean spring water, as opposed to Elijah’s, who came from a lower social class than Elisha (Gary para. 4). Elijah had less hair on his body than Elijah, according to 2 Kings 2:23 (King James Bible, 2 King 1-2.5), and he also had more hair on his body than Elijah, according to 2 Kings 1:8 (King James Bible, 2 King 1). Elisha ministered for twice as long as Elijah did. Elisha performed several miraculous deeds nearly double the amount that Elijah accomplished.

Impacts of the two characters

These two men, as leaders and servants of the people, feared God and devotedly served them in leading them to their rescues. There’s no mention in the Bible that these prophets were involved in any wrongdoing. They lived their lives dedicated to God, and his many miracles during their time attest to this. Elisha, for example, was a friend of mankind who spent much of his time with them happily.

See also  Gardening Essay

Value of the characters inline with revelation of Biblical story

The characters of the two men demonstrate or provide various spiritual lessons that people in today’s world can learn and apply to their lives. The Bible is a holy book that passes on, communicates, or teaches spiritual knowledge so individuals may transform their behaviors and draw nearer to God.

It is quite clear that the biblical narrative about these two individuals has had a beneficial influence on people’s lives. They were committed to their job in God. They assisted others in knowing God and preaching about His goodness. Their trust and faith in God are some of the virtues exhibited by the pair during their time. As a result, they attempt to show religious believers that they should have confidence and trust in God. This is also demonstrated by the many miracles that God enabled them to perform throughout their ministries.

Lesson/teaching from the character

Various lessons or teachings may be drawn from these tales. One of the lessons that I have learned from the narrative and that I believe will help me in my life is trust and faith in God Almighty. Elijah and Elisha trusted in God, which anointed them to be his servants. Because to their loyalty, God enabled them to perform numerous miracles because they had faith in him. As a result, I am moved, and I now have faith that with God’s help, nothing is impossible in our world.

Reasons for choosing this lesson

The major reason I picked this lesson is that, in most cases, I’ve never given or had faith in God that He could transform my life and help me achieve my objectives. However, after reading this tale, I was inspired and uplifted. I was astonished by how believing in and having faith in God may change one’s life. When a person has trust and faith in God, He is able to anoint them into His kingdom.

Strengthening my life

This is a lesson that I can learn from and use in my life. I may apply this lesson by changing the way I live my life and devoting it entirely to God, who is the Alpha and the Omega. In response to God’s will, I believe His blessings will shine down upon me and strengthen my faith and confidence in Him when I surrender my life to him and follow his instructions.

Second, attending church and being prayerful in all areas of my life can help me grow as a Christian. Always remaining close to God is required of faith. Prayers are how we come into contact with God. Furthermore, I will attempt to modify or alter my behaviors and actions. I will try to follow the laws of God and do good for my neighbors,

Essay 2

Whether or not a leader’s influence will outlive the years in office of a specific leader is an issue of succession of leadership. Succession is viewed differently in various situations. In contrast to the United Kingdom, the United States handles presidential succession in a distinct manner than it does that of the monarch or prime minister. Higher levels within an episcopal organization have authority over decisions about succession.

The body of elders or the congregation is responsible for deciding local matters, such as the call of a new minister. The representative model, which can be found in Presbyterian congregations, looks to gatherings of delegates to keep God’s presence and witness by filling vacant pulpits.

In any of these cases, the real event of succession might be happy or unpleasant, and if we have spent any time in a church, examples will spring to mind. The issue of succession has therefore received fresh consideration in the literature on leadership. A current volume on “religious leadership traditions” includes questions regarding how succession was handled, including recruitment, training, education, and support.

It has also inspired a study of relevant biblical texts. This essay examines the relationship between Elijah and Elisha as seen in 1 and 2 Kings to see what insights can be gained about the issue of succession. The succession of Elisha in Elijah’s ministry is described in I Kings 19:19. Elijah is at a high point of his success as a prophet, having shown the supremacy of Israel’s God over Baal, and destroying the Baal priests (1 Kings 18:38-40).

See also  Classroom Behavior Essay

However, as Queen Jezebel learns of it and threatens to murder him for his misdeeds, he “escapes for his life” (19:3) into the wilderness, where he remains for forty days. Elijah’s ministry is delayed at Horeb, the mountain where Moses received the Law, when the Lord commands him to return to battle.

Elijah must anoint Hazael of Syria as the designated scourge of Israel, and Jehu of Israel as the designated champion of Israel, and Elisha as the appointed “prophet in your place,” according to this command. Elijah leaves immediately to look for Elisha plowing in the field, where he is found by Elijah “throwing his mantle over him.” From that time, Elisha serves with Elijah’s company, “ministering to him” (19:15-21).

In sequence, the passage refers to a number of features. The first is the benefit or advantage of established succession, which we may not overlook, especially for the prophet. While we cannot say that we hear about Elijah the charred being “comforted” at Horeb, at least he emerges from his cave and resumes his prophetic activity. Then again, the location of succession is clearly in God’s plan.

Elijah’s successor is not something that Elijah thinks of or asks for; God both promotes the idea and identifies the candidate. Third, there are some factors that are difficult to interpret. Elisha obeys promptly and completely (as we must infer from 19:20-21, resisting the urge to read into it a Gospel incident like as in Luke 9:61-62). But we don’t know what his “ministry” to Elijah entailed or what it had to do with succession.

The assertion that “he poured water on the hands of Elijah” (2 Kings 3:11) adds little. There is a group of “sons of the prophets” who appear to have congregated around Elijah (1 Kings 20:35; 2 Kings 3-5), although Elisha remains distinct from them. Was there a mentor-pupil relationship between Elisha and Elijah? Was Elisha learning attitudes, tactics, or techniques from him?

There is no evidence in our literature that such ideas are encouraged. In fact, the second significant writing on the subject only adds to the uncertainty of their connection and the goal of their cooperative effort. 2 Kings 2 records Elijah’s ascension and Elisha’s ministry beginning. Elisha is clearly identified as Elijah’s successor here. The narrative, however, emphasizes the element of space between them with its second clear theme.

While Elisha and his servant, Gehazi, are burying the dog of the man who slew the Egyptian (2:8), Jesus appears to them in a vision. As they prepare to take their leave of each other, Elijah informs Elisha that his time has come. Perhaps alluding to this passage’s description of Christ as both lion and lamb (see 1:13-14)

The phrase “I am weary” (2 Kings 2:17) is interpreted in different ways by various authors. Some see it as Elisha’s request for an even greater prophet than Elijah; does he want to be twice the prophet that Elijah was? Is he asking for the “twin” or equivalent of Elijah’s anointing? Is he requesting for the conventional bequest, since the eldest son of an estate divided among many gets it? The difficulty involved in this request, according to Elijah, should be taken into account.

So Elijah leaves it to the Lord, who will either allow Elisha to behold God or not: “If you see me as I am being taken from you, it will be granted to you; if not, it will not” (2:10). Elisha does see the ascension and take up the prophet’s mantle (2:12, 13-14, 15-25), although certain details of his understanding remain unclear. The term “double portion” refers in this case to Elisha’s rapid succession of Elijah as prophet in Israel.

Is Elisha the continuation of Elijah’s work? The answer is most likely both yes and no. Elijah makes an abrupt entrance into the picture, so personal succession isn’t strictly necessary. But Elisha is expressly designated as a “prophet in [Elijah’s] stead.” Other ties between the two prophets are significant to the narrative; the Horeb tale complements the ascension story by emphasizing continuity in ministry; only through their connection are these two characters’ calls recognized.)

The emphasis in Elisha’s ministry is on the religious and moral life of Israel, as well as its political and social development. Furthermore, certain (but not all) components of Elijah’s service are repeated or completed in Elisha’s ministry. Both ministries focus on the nation of Israel as a whole, as well as the care of individuals within it.

See also  A&P John Updike Essay

As for more specific elements, Elisha accomplished what was expected of Jehu’s anointing on Elijah; and Jezebel’s fate predicted by Elijah is brought about by Elisha. We see Elisha continuing what Elijah began in these ways.

Elijah, on the other hand, is a much more solitary figure. Elisha, in contrast, resides in towns and has frequent contacts with ordinary people (such as Shunnamite woman 2 Kings 4:8-37). As a result, there are more tales of Elisha’s miracles among the population, which reflects the ministry of Jesus.

Elijah’s basic attitude toward God appears to be more tenuous than Elisha’s; whereas Elijah flees for his life, Elisha follows eagerly, asking for as much chance as he can get. The stories about Elijah tend to span several chapters, while those about Elisha are shorter and more varied. If all of this points to anything, it may indicate that the motivation, path, and success of these ministries were determined by personalities and circumstances rather than just the succession question.

Finally, it’s now possible to make the theological case that Elisha’s ministry isn’t strictly speaking in succession to Elijah; rather, it is a chain of prophetic ministry to the Lord, reliant on Elijah and continuing thereafter, but which represents the Lord far more effectively than Elijah ever did.

The conventional techniques for negotiating the human and divine aspects of ministerial call and succession are all well-intentioned efforts to reconcile the natural with the supernatural. Too often, what we see is just a look at the human side, which includes its own set of intricacies, achievements, and disappointments.However, each of these customs must also be prepared to face the strong theological problem posed by these passages in 1 and 2 Kings, which succession with its nuances and confusions might still be a vertical commitment to the outreach of the good news of God’s word.

“Despite their differences, the commonality of our two prophets is in their potency and integrity of their message, as T. R. Hobbs notes: ‘In Elijah and Elisha, Israel recognized a prophet among them.’” —Theopulos

Essay 3

Elijah and Elisha were prophets who battled the Baal in Israel. Before its flight, Israel was split into two kingdoms, with Elijah and his successor, Elisha, representing the final great spiritual heroes. Their activity in northern Israel opposing King Ahab and Jezebel helped to reduce the amount of evil that was engulfing Israel. This meant Elijah and Elisha could become miracle workers instead of rulers before the demise of Israel.

As a result of these differences, both Elijah and Elisha were recognized for their achievements. There were many parallels between Elijah and Elisha, but they also had significant distinctions. Both Elijah and Elisha were blessed by God in extraordinary ways that ordinary people would not be allowed to do., Rain was predicted by both Elijah and Elisha during a drought.

Elijah vanished after declaring a drought in 1 Kings 17:1, since God instructed him to go east of the Jordan, where Ravens would feed him. He was out of public view, and it seemed as if he were announcing the curse’s passing since God had declared sin to be atoned by drought in the nation. “Go and present yourself to Ahab,” says God to Elijah (I Kings 18:1). Elisha also made a weather prediction in a similar situation but with a different outcome.

Elisha did not contact a king, but rather three kings came to pay him a visit. The three rulers asked Elisha to pray for them. Because not only would the kings be satisfied, but also the Lord’s water would overflow as a result of his decision. There was another that was nearly identical to it, and both their oil miracles were close together. Elijah and Elisha had similar experiences with a widow. In both instances, the widow possessed a little jar of olive oil, and in both cases she was able to keep pouring it out as long as she needed to solve her problem.

Cite this page

Choose cite format:
Difference Between Elijah And Elisha Essay. (2021, Nov 17). Retrieved March 24, 2023, from