Searching for an essay?

Browse the database of more than 4500 essays donated by our community members!

Should Guns be Banned in America?

Should guns be banned? This is one of the broadest asked questions. Some believe that guns should be banned, as guns are the number one killer. All around the world, small arms stocks were destroyed in the hope of lowering the number of guns in the world. South Africa’s destruction of 24 000 small arms today is part of worldwide small arms destructions – 6 000 illegal guns were destroyed in Cambodia, 1 700 in Mozambique and 10 000 weapons were destroyed in Brazil. Through these destructions, governments worldwide are showing their support for the regulation of the small arms trade – a trade that kills an estimated 500 000 people each year.

Handguns and other firearms have a long tradition in American civilization. The right to bear arms is an American right featured in the Second Amendment of the Constitution. In the 18th century, when the constitution was written, times were different; there was a need for armed citizens to ensure the safety of society as a whole. Contemporarily, the police department preserves society’s safety, and the need for armed citizens is out of date. The founding fathers of the Constitution could presumably never imagine the horrendous outcome of their actions. Yet, every year, too many lives are claimed due to the American government’s inability to fully face the effects of the issue. Compared to other western countries with considerably stricter gun control laws, America is still viewed as “The Wild-Wild West.”

Writing service




[Rated 96/100]

Prices start at $12
Min. deadline 6 hours
Writers: ESL
Refund: Yes

Payment methods: VISA, MasterCard, American Express


[Rated 94/100]

Prices start at $11
Min. deadline 3 hours
Writers: ESL, ENL
Refund: Yes

Payment methods: VISA, MasterCard, American Express, Discover


[Rated 92/100]

Prices start at $14
Min. deadline 8 hours
Writers: ESL, ENL
Refund: Yes

Payment methods: VISA, MasterCard, JCB, Discover


[Rated 91/100]

Prices start at $12
Min. deadline 3 hours
Writers: ESL, ENL
Refund: Yes

Payment methods: VISA, MasterCard, JCB, Discover

The growing gun-related death toll in the U.S. has to come to a turning point. Stripping away the constitutional right to bear arms might imply that only criminals will have access to guns. It is essential to understand that in a society where both criminals and law-abiding citizens have access to guns, the likeliness of an innocent person getting shot when both parties are waving guns is probably greater than if only criminals have guns. A ban on firearms might not be appealing as a short-term solution, but it is essential that people don’t limit their thinking to their generation and not think about the safety of their children, grandchildren, and the society people are creating today for them to live in.

The main obstacle in removing firearms from citizens in the U.S. is the Second Amendment of the Constitution. It reads: “A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment can be interpreted as every citizen’s right to bear arms. However, the keyword is “Militia,” meaning soldiers or defenders of the State. In the late 18th century, when the Constitution was written, times were very different than those of contemporary America.

See also  How does the 1955 Film Rebel without a Cause Establish Many of the Generic Conventions of Teen Movies?

People were scared of possible invasions from Native Americans, the English, and other nationalities. By “a well regulated Militia…” the founding fathers probably meant that citizens could have a mascot standing in the corner just in case anything would happen. Note that the writers of the Constitution added, “A well regulated…” in front of the word Militia. Although that would most likely reveal a controversy in writing this Amendment, some of the founding fathers might have foreseen the possibility of a misinterpretation of this Amendment.

In the U.S., there are approximately 200 million privately owned guns, which is statistically close to a gun per person and places more than one gun per home on average (O’Donnell 771). In other words, guns are all around. This effects, without a doubt, the whole social structure and the citizens that live within its boundaries. The children that live within a gun-infested society are going to suffer the consequences. Kids between the ages of 16 and 19 have the highest handgun victimization rate among all age groups. It’s not hard to understand why, since there are on average more than one gun per household, kids are likely to find a firearm and, in some cases, even use it.

Here are a couple of incidents that occurred not so long ago. All are witness statements taken down by the police and are all in favor of the government to take action: “A shopkeeper who was shot dead in a robbery stepped in front of her killers to save her daughter, said her husband.” “Thieves killed Marion Bates, 64, in front of her daughter Xanthe in an attack at their family jewelry store in Arnold, Nottingham, on Tuesday.” “A man has died, and another has been injured after a drive-by shooting in Hertfordshire.”

“Police say two men came under fire- most possibly from an automatic weapon- outside the Physical Limit Health and Fitness Club in Brewery road in Hoddesdon Gun Control in the United States of America is a topic that has had some criticism and support by many citizens. The critical people of this topic believe that guns do not kill people; it is the people that kill people. The supporters of this topic believe that guns lead to violence and a feeling of power over others. They also believe that if guns were eliminated from the public, violence and death would decrease heavily in this country. These two opposing views leave the federal government open to a decision on whether or not to abolish one of our Constitutional rights or to keep allowing people the right to own a gun.

See also  Compare And Contrast Poem Essay

A weapon, usually a gun accompanied the majority of crimes committed in the United States. The Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research dedicates its service to prevent gun-related deaths and injuries. Studies have proven that in 1997 there were 32,436 gun-related deaths which calculated out equals 88 deaths a day. Researchers from the University of Chicago, John Lott and David Mustard, showed that violent crime is reduced when citizens have a law that allows them to carry concealed weapons. In 1994 a crime bill was passed that included an assault weapons ban that outlawed the manufacturing and selling of semiautomatic weapons and prohibited the manufacturing of copies.

The Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research was established in 1995 and applied an approach to informing the public about guns. The Center attempts to educate the public about firearm injuries and new gun policies. The Center tries to prove that the safety of guns can be regulated as we would regulate the safety of other consumer goods. The Center looks into legal and public strategies to reduce the amounts of injuries and deaths due to guns. The Center creates and evaluates policies to restrict the availability of weapons to high-risk users. The faculty of the Center evaluates the effect of gun laws such as those banning the Saturday Night Specials or permitting the carrying of a concealed weapon. The Center also conducts surveys to find out from the public what people think about gun laws and policies.

There is, like all arguments, a reason why guns should not be banned. There are reasons which have to be accounted for, such as the quote “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.”. For almost as long as guns have been around, gun control has been a significant issue throughout the world. As we look back on the past, we find that gun control it is said that gun control doesn’t really help reduce crime. Another downside of gun control is that if the government takes away the right to own weapons then they will start to think they can take other rights away.

With every new anti-gun law passed the crime rate in the United States escalates. For example, if you look at the state of Texas or any other state where pro-gun laws were recently passed, that allow non-felon citizens to purchase and carry a handgun, you can see that crime rates have gone down in these states. It appears that if criminals feel threatened, because their victims may have a gun, they are less likely to attack people. This example shows how gun laws that restrict guns are ineffective because when a law that allows guns is passed crime rates don’t go up but actually go down when more people have guns.

See also  "Heaven and Hell are Concepts without Philosophical Foundations" Discuss

“Gun laws fail because they do not address the issue. The issue is not the possession of firearms, but misuse of firearms. We cannot expect criminals to abide by gun laws when they have already shown a disregard for law and order by their criminal activity. The only people ever affected by gun laws are peaceful, law-abiding citizens, who never abuse their firearms right. Recent research is finding gun laws do not reduce the amount of violent crime in our society. Gun laws have succeeded only in disarming the law-abiding and making the criminals’ work environment safer I submit that our concern should be to make the environment for honest citizens, and this, gun laws have failed to do.”

Thomas Jefferson predicted these same results when he said, “Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather encourage than prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed one.” If someone is a criminal they either don’t really care about breaking the law or they don’t plan on getting caught.

It is absurd to pass laws that restrict law-abiding citizens from owning weapons because it isn’t the citizens, that are obeying the laws, that should be punished for the wrongdoing of the criminals. A robber is not going to stop and think wow I better not hold up this store, with this gun, just because it is illegal. Robbing a store is illegal in the first place, but the robber is still going to rob the store, so what is the point of making guns illegal. The law shouldn’t be on the gun it should be against the person using the gun. The gun itself did nothing wrong. If a robber robs a store the gun is not thinking of moving by itself so it can’t be blamed for the crime.

Cite this page

Choose cite format:
Should Guns be Banned in America?. (2021, Sep 27). Retrieved January 23, 2022, from