Chiaroscuro is a technique, employed by artists and photographers alike, which focuses on strong contrasts between light and dark, to transform and highlight certain aspects of the composition. It’s also used as an effective way of portraying the curvature and dimensions of the human form. In photography, it’s often compared to Rembrandt lighting, a type of lighting that darkens a section of a figure, making the image more striking and natural, by using stronger lighting in a particular direction. Lighting can also be ambient – seen more often in the works of impressionists, on water. Ambient lighting gives a softer, more natural feel.
Chiaroscuro originated during the renaissance. It was developed by working with black paper, and light and dark inks. Most early works of this type were monochrome. Mocronome, and using shading techniques, helped give the impression of three-dimensional volume, which made paintings and photos bolder. Most of the time, minimal light was used. During the baroque era, the light was mostly used in a nativity scene, to represent the light of God, and to highlight a religious, or important individual in a painting, the light making them look appealing. Artists such as Giovanni Baglione and Caravaggio employed this style during this time, eventually developing tenebrism – a form of even more dramatic chiaroscuro, which was dominant in all their works.
Prices start at $12
Prices start at $11
Prices start at $14
Prices start at $12
“Chiaroscuro is generally only remarked upon when it is a particularly prominent feature of the work, usually when the artist is using extreme contrasts of light and shade.” – Tate
Michealangelo Caravaggio was born in 1571. He was an Italian artist, and his works were based around the themes of the physical, human state. He used dramatic lighting in his works to express human emotion. At the time when he was working, there was a focus on religious art – to combat the threat of Protestantism in Spain. Caravaggio employed the use of Chiascuro, and tenebrism, to make his naturalistic characters look dramatic, and focus on feelings and emotions. The realism of his figures added even more intensity to the emotions felt in the painting. He was incredibly talented – he worked directly onto canvas whilst painting his models, not even sketching the painting.
Judith Beheading Holofernes 1598-1599 demonstrates Caravaggio’s use of tenebristic lighting, to create a mysterious, dark feeling. The limited light highlights the action and important character in the painting. Depending on the subject matter, the light could come from any different direction – here it is straight onto Judith, showing that she is the main character. You can also see the light falling onto the man’s arm, it highlights all the muscles and contours of the body, adding realism and focusing on the three-dimensional. Shadows falling on individuals also highlight their attitude or emotions. The strong dark colours around the older woman, and man, make it clear they are the bad, or sinning characters. Caravaggio’s way of painting every single human flaw and detail is why he was disliked – seen here on the old woman’s skin, even further emphasized by the contrasting light. Monet’s work, whilst still focussing on the use of light, is very dissimilar to a work like this of Caravaggio. The background is black, and the only illuminated parts are bland, naturalistic, but everyday colors. Alternatively, Monet chooses to use blue as his shadowing color, to reflect the sky, and also takes all the colors he sees, at the time of day, and exaggerates them to make a mood. Because he worked outdoors, he could capture the light and different times of the day.
Adding to this, whilst Caravaggio uses shadows and darkness to point out who is the negative figure in his paintings, Rego uses the unappealing body shape and posture, as well as the faces, to make all the figures in her work unappealing and unlikeable to the viewer, giving her paintings some degree of questionability, into why/what/the characters are doing.
Caravaggio’s techniques, and use of realistic, not romanticized, figures, received criticism from some other practicing artists during that time.
“His great Sicilian altarpieces isolate their shadowy, pitifully poor figures in vast areas of darkness; they suggest the desperate fears and frailty of man, and at the same time convey, with a new yet desolate tenderness, the beauty of humility and of the meek, who shall inherit the earth”
Whilst younger, new painters in Rome renowned him for his novelty use of lighting, and his accurate depictions of the human form. However, it was his accurate, lifelike depictions of the human form that made other artists consider his work vulgar. He had many problems with religious commissions, because of the sinister, harsh lighting, and almost grotesquely accurate human form. This is in stark contrast to the work of Paula Rego, who works using rougher brush strokes, more similar to the style of impressionism. She makes her characters short and stocky and leaves out most detail, so your left to focus on the short, wrong looking stature that they have, and contemplate if the character is good, or if they are bad, as the facial expressions and body make the characters look so menacing.
Impressionism originated in the 19th century. The style of impressionism is characterized by distinguishable, bold brush strokes, and emphasis on the light and colors. The Impressionists were the first group of painters to begin painting outside (“en plein air”), in order to observe the colors and effect of outside lighting, so they could capture particular times in the day.
Impasto is the technique often used in works of impressionism. Little, or no mixing of the colors means that the paint can look more vibrant, often leading to a brighter result. This was good for light reflections and sunny scenes. The constant application of paint meant that the edges are typically softer, which
When painting, an impasto technique is often used, to apply the paint thickly, quickly, and without drying. This leads to more vibrant colors, and as the paint is wet, it leads to softer edges, which produces a more relaxed, yet vibrant finish. This is in stark contrast to Caravaggio’s use of precision, muted dark colors against bright, and hard, exact edges. Impressionism is good for day scenes, as the relaxed nature of painting means that the colors, i.e. the reds of sunset can be captured quickly, and the softer lighting means that the scene will look more serene and tranquil, unlike the muted colorless paintings of Caravaggio, which contrasts and exact realism create tension and dark tones.
Nympheas, 1915, Monet. You can see the clear brushstrokes, a contrast from the works of Caravaggio, where detail and precision are key. Monet’s relaxed use of brushstrokes makes the work look more relaxed, and calm. Monet and other impressionists focussed more on the reflections and colors of the light, letting it consume the painting, resulting in bright, vivid paintings, with the exaggerated brushstrokes highlighting the rippling of water, which was so commonly painted by Monet.
Caravaggio’s works seem the opposite; it’s almost as the darkness is consuming the whole image – there is less light, and the little light there is harsh and strongly focussed, whilst Monet’s work the light is soft and gentle, illuminating the colors. Typical chiaroscuro works are in black and white, getting rid of the brighter colors often just exaggerate the contrasts. There are only limited contrasts in Paula Rego’s work, but she uses lighter shadows, and realistic-looking colors, in an effective way, which creates tension and mood.
Whilst Caravaggio and other chiaroscuro artists used blacks and dark, sad colors as the shadow, impressionists use the blue of the sky to reflect on other surfaces, leaving the end result looking brighter and fresher.
Claude Monet was born in 1840. Monet was the main founder of French impressionism – (‘impressionism’ taken from the title of one of his paintings – ‘impression, sunrise’), and renowned for staying firmly in that style, working outside and employing all the techniques.
He studied the works of John Constable, William Turner, and Joseph Mallord, who all inspired him to focus on the colors the light casts over a landscape. (left: Wivenhoe Park, John Constable) Showing his use of lighting and reflections on the lake.
Whilst Monet’s lighthearted, romanticized scenes of water, landscapes, and reflections were very popular, he did receive criticism from a humorist, Louis Leroy, who criticized the whole movement for looking unfinished, too simple. He also criticized the ‘lack of workmanship’ that went into the pieces. He remarked in an article, regarding Monet’s work.
“Impression-I was certain of it. I was just telling myself that, since I was impressed, there had to be some impression in it … and what freedom, what ease of workmanship! Wallpaper in its embryonic state is more finished than that seascape”
When, in 1923, Monet had an operation to remove his cataracts, it was found that the reddish tones he often used in paintings disappeared, and Monet began using bluer, and other colors. It’s thought that Monet may of even be able to see ultraviolet light, which would of certainly affected his color perception. He later corrected some of his reddish paintings, adding more blue hues.
Sea-Roses (Yellow Nirwana), 1920. Like most other impressionists, Monet rarely used black, nor many dark colors in his paintings. Impressionism was based around the reflections and different interpretations of color, depending on the time of day, and the feeling the painting was meant to evoke. By using yellows, oranges, and red, it emphasizes the idea of a sunset or late afternoon. The blue sections would of been the reflection of the sky, as impressionists rarely used darker colors, and preferred to use natural light, not work by candlelight, like Caravaggio.
Paula rego works in a similar way to Monet, she also uses the natural colors that are available with the scene. For example, in the painting ‘the dance’, Rego uses the blue from the sky and the surrounding water, to create a sad, negative-looking scene. She also uses natural moonlight. Unlike Caravaggio, both Monet and Rego choose to use natural lighting to add emphasis and mood to their paintings and also utilize reflections of already present colors, that go along with the day. Caravaggio’s work doesn’t use exterior light and is almost always indoors. Similarly, Rego’s are, but she can use window light, and brighter lights from lamps, etc, but Caravaggio just uses dark shadows and one bright candlelight.
Whilst Caravaggio’s work may have the most contrast, and therefore the most impact, The works of Monet use light in a way that emphasizes a certain mood at the time of day – Caravaggio does not capture the light and colors of daytime, sticking to the same, indoor color pallete. Rego’s works are also based indoors, and she utilizes natural light as well, but she uses a wider color palette, so her shadows aren’t as effective. Instead, rego chooses to focus on the stature of her characters and places her shadows so that it emphasizes the unattractive qualities of her figures. Rego’s paintings may also be the most life-like, in color. While Monet picks up on natural colors and emphasizes them to put across mood and feeling, Rego uses the bland colors that she sees in everyday life, and just adds more menacing shadows to this light already. Caravaggio’s pallet is too harsh to be considered ‘everyday, realistic’ lighting.
Paula Rego was a Portuguese painter, born in 1935. She was nominated for the Turner Prize and got an honorary degree from Oxford University in 2005. She was married to another artist, Victor Willing. THey together established the London group of artists, together with artists such as David Hockney.
Rego’s work is reminiscent of cartoons, and she often puts a surreal, sinister feeling onto her paintings, through the use of light, distortion, and figures. It has been described as ‘magical realism. She has been said to be a painter of ‘Contemporary Mythologies’, this is shown by the way she takes traditional fairytales or old images, and adds an underlying emotion, feel of sexuality, and feeling to all the characters involved, through the way she paints figures and her use of light.
Rego’s ‘The Maids’ (1987) was inspired by a 1947 play (of the same name) by Jean Genet, and this is where some of the storylines from some of her paintings come from. The basic storyline of the maids was that the two sisters (the maids) murdered a mother and daughter. The painting focuses on the unnatural closeness of the sisters. Rego uses stocky, unappealing-looking figures to make her paintings seem almost repulsive. She also makes the viewer question the sexuality of her figures, as most of them look masculine. Rego uses shadows in her paintings to give a feeling of uneasy, sinisterness. Here in this painting, there is a shadow on the wall, as well as a large shadow on the floor – this makes the characters seem bigger in terms of the painting, and also makes the figures look intimidating. It helps make the room seem more claustrophobic and gives a feeling of menace.
Rego doesn’t utilize Chiascruo like Caravaggio, as Caravaggio uses a dark shadow to consume the painting, and illuminates, by candlelight, only certain sections of figures for emphasis, and to give the painting a negative, and menacing undertone. Rego uses brighter light sources, such as windows and lamps, then darkens a larger area of the image, for shadowing impact. She also uses the shadow for sides of faces, to make them look sinister. While rego’s work looks more lighthearted than Caravaggio’s, her use of short, stocky figures, and the way her faces are unreadable, makes the mood of the painting uneasy, and equally as effective as Caravaggio’s work. I think Rego focuses more on figures, faces, and the action in the painting, whilst Caravaggio focuses on smaller details, like facial expression, and picks them out using a harsh light, for his main effect. Rego’s work is more similar to Monet’s, as she does use more natural light sources, and tends to use dark colors more sparingly than Caravaggio.
Left, “The Dance” 1988, uses more dramatic shadows than its former, but still uses natural, moonlight, as opposed to strong, contrasting candlelight, like Caravaggio. The blues are emphasized in this work by Rego, which is the reflection of the sky and the water, the natural lighting reflections, which is similar to what Monet does in many of his works, as he stays away from using blacks. Again, Rego has used blue, a typically negative color, to convey mood, of uncertainty and maybe sadness. Similarly, Monet uses yellows, oranges, sunset/morning colors, to convey a feeling of relaxation and tranquility in his works. Caravaggio, like the others, mainly uses black and muted bright colors for maximum contrast and emphasis. Whilst Caravaggio was praised for his extremely life-like, realistic figures, Rego’s are almost cartoon-like, which makes them look less appealing.
I chose these three artists to study because they focussed most on the techniques of light and dark in their paintings to establish a mood and feel. My favorite is Caravaggio because I like the stark contrast and detail he can get, by highlighting certain areas and figures, and I also appreciate the accuracy in his work. I also like Monet’s work, because of the way he captured and exaggerated certain colors brought on by the time of day, and the subject matter, and then utilized these to give the painting a distinctive feeling. Although I’d prefer to focus on figures for this project, as I have mostly done patterns and objects so far, and I think it would be good for me to try and paint a person.
I also think It would be cool to try and distort Caravaggio’s technique, and perhaps use more color instead of black shadow, so the painting looks more upbeat, and I could capture a particular time of day whilst keeping the impact from using a singular stark light source. I don’t really want to paint any cartoon-similar paintings, like Paula rego, because the idea doesn’t really appeal to me, and I think the way she does figures is really unattractive, yet really intriguing. She has inspired me to perhaps try and distort a body using light, which would look really effective. I’m not sure if I want to use impressionist painting styles, as I prefer to have a smooth surface, and getting accuracy, without having to use techniques such as impasto, but I think I could use it on sections, for a more effective image.
Cite this page
This content was submitted by our community members and reviewed by Essayscollector Team. All content on this page is verified and owned by Essayscollector Team. All comments and user reviews are moderated by Essayscollector Team. In the case of any content-related problem, you can reach us through the report button.