The system of Checks and Balances. The U.S. Government has three branches of government Legislative, Judicial, and Executive. These branches of government have a means of checks (constitutional) by the other branches. Each has certain powers to check and balances the other two branches.
The good about these checks is that the other two branches don’t get too powerful. When the constitution was first forming, checks and balances were first used.
Prices start at $10
Prices start at $11
Prices start at $9
Each branch of government is different. The legislative branch is made up of Congress. The Executive branch is the President and his staff. The Judicial branch is made up of the Supreme Court and other Federal courts. The legislative branch makes the law, the Executive branch carries out the law, and the judicial branch interprets the law. During the time the system of Checks and Balances were used over the years as it was intended to do.
Congress makes the laws, creates agencies and programs, and appropriates funds to carry out the laws and programs. They may override a veto with a two-thirds vote, may remove the President through impeachment, and the Senate approves treaties and presidential appointments.
The Executive branch appoints Supreme Court Justices and other federal judges. The Judicial branch judges, appointed for life, are free from executive control. They also have the courts declare executive actions to be unconstitutional.
Clashes between each branch are hardly ever known. The system of the check-balance system operates all the time. Most of the checks happen in the Capital. But some clashes can occur; The President does veto some acts of Congress. On some occasions, Congress has to override one of the president’s vetoes.
And some rare occasions, the Senate does reject one of the president’s appointees. And most direct confrontations are not common. The three branches try to avoid them. The Checks-and-Balance system makes compromise easy and necessary-and it’s part of the democratic government.
James Madison in his essay, The Federalist No.51, uses words to describe the main idea of the uses of Checks and Balances or in other words keeping the branches of government “in their proper places.” An example, when the President picks someone to serve in some important office in the executive branch. Say the Secretary of State of the Director of the F.B.I or the C.I.A, and the President is aware that the Senate must confirm that appointment. In other words, the President picks someone who will very likely be approved by the Senate.
In similar was when Congress makes law. It does so with a careful eye on the President’s veto power. And the power of the courts to review its actions. Checks-and-balances system has prevented Эan unjust combination of the majority.” It has not very often stalled a close working relationship between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches from time to time.
The President and a majority in both houses of Congress are especially true in a good working relationship. When the other party controls one or both houses, conflicts play a larger than usual part in that relationship-as they have in recent years. As part of the system of checks and balances, courts have the power of judicial review. The power to decide whether what government does is in accord with what the Constitution provides
In other words, the U.S. government has used the system of checks and balances for many years. And it will be this way for many other years until someone changes it. But I think that will come to mind.