Using animals for testing is wrong and should be banned. They have rights just as we do. Twenty-four hours a day 7 days a week, humans are using Defenceless animals for cruel and most often useless tests. The animals have no way of fighting back. This is why there should be new laws to protect them. These legislations also need to be enforced more regularly. Too many criminals get away with murder. Although private companies run most labs, experiments are often conducted by public organizations. IN PARTICULAR, the US government, Army and Air force have designed and carried out many animal experiments. The purposed experiments were engineered so that many animals would suffer and die without any certainty that this suffering and death would save a single life or benefit humans in any way at all, but the same can be said for tens of thousands of other experiments performed in the US each year.
Limiting it to just experiments done on beagles, the following might shock most people: For instance, at the Lovelace Foundation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, experimenters forced sixty-four beagles to inhale radioactive Strontium 90 as part of a larger Fission Product Inhalation Program which began in 1961 and has been paid for by the US Atomic Energy Commission. In this experiment, Twenty-five of the dogs eventually died. One of the deaths occurred during an epileptic seizure; another was from a brain hemorrhage. Other dogs, before death, became feverish and anemic, lost their appetites, and had hemorrhages. The experimenters in their published report compared their results with that of other experiments conducted at the University of Utah and the Argonne National Laboratory in which beagles were injected with Strontium 90.
They concluded that the dose needed to produce early death in fifty percent of the sample group differed from test to test because the dogs injected with Strontium 90 retain more of the radioactive substance than dogs forced to inhale it. Also, at the University of Rochester School Of Medicine, experimenters put fifty beagles in wooden boxes and irradiated them with different radiation levels by x-rays. Twenty-one of the dogs died within the first two weeks. The experimenters determined the dose at which fifty percent of the animals will die with ninety-five percent confidence. The irritated dogs vomited, had diarrhea, and lost their appetites. Later, they hemorrhaged from the mouth, nose, and eyes. In their report, the experimenters compared their experiment to others of the same nature, that each used around seven hundred dogs.
The experimenters said that the injuries produced in their own experiment were Typical of those described for the dog (Singer 30). Similarly, experimenters for the US Food and Drug Administration gave thirty beagles and thirty pigs large amounts of Methoxychlor (a pesticide) in their food, seven days a week for six months, In order to ensure tissue damage. Within eight weeks, eleven dogs exhibited signs of abnormal behaviour, including nervousness, salivation, muscle spasms, and convolutions. Dogs in convulsions breathed as rapidly as two hundred times a minute before they passed out from lack of oxygen. Upon recovery from an episode of convulsions and collapse, the dogs were uncoordinated and apparently blind. Any stimulus such as dropping a feeding pan, squirting water, or touching the animals initiated another convulsion.
Everyone is supposed to be equal in this country, but apparently, some people just don’t have to obey the law. That is, in New York and some other states, licensed laboratories are immune from ordinary anticruelty laws, and these places are often owned by state universities, city hospitals, or even The United States Public Health Service. It seems suspicious that some government-run facilities could be immune from their own laws. In relation, No law requires that cosmetics or household products be tested on animals. Nevertheless, by six o clock this evening, hundreds of animals will have their eyes, skin, or gastrointestinal systems unnecessarily burned or destroyed. Many animals will suffer and die this year to produce new versions of deodorant, hair spray, lipstick, nail polish, and lots of other products. Some of the largest cosmetics companies use animals to test their products.
These are just a couple of the horrifying tests they use, namely, the Drazie Test. The Drazie test is performed almost exclusively on albino rabbits. They are preferred because they are docile, cheap, and their eyes do not shed tears (so chemicals placed in them do not wash out). They are also the test subject of choice because their eyes are clear, making it easier to observe the destruction of eye tissue; their corneal membranes are extremely susceptible to injury. During each test, the rabbits are immobilized (usually in a “stock,” with only their heads protruding), and a solid or liquid is placed in the lower lid of one eye of each rabbit. These substances can range from mascara to aftershave to oven cleaner. The rabbit’s eyes remain clipped open. Anesthesia is almost never administered. After that, the rabbits are examined at intervals of one, twenty-four, forty-eight, seventy-two, and one hundred and sixty-eight hours.
Reactions, which may range from severe inflammation to clouding of the cornea to ulceration and rupture of the eyeball, are recorded by technicians. Some studies continue for a period of weeks. No other attempt is made to treat the rabbits or to seek any antidotes. The rabbits who survive the Drazie test may then be used as subjects for skin inflammation tests. Another widely used procedure is the LD-50. This is the abbreviation of the Lethal Dose 50 test. LD-50 is the lethal dose of something that will kill fifty percent of all animals in a group of forty to two hundred. Most commonly, animals are force-fed substances (which may be toothpaste, shaving cream, drain cleaner, pesticides, or anything else they want to test) through a stomach tube and observed for two weeks or until death. Non-oral methods of administering the test include injection, forced inhalation, or application to an animal’s skin. Symptoms routinely include tremors, convulsions, vomiting, diarrhea, paralysis, or bleeding from the eyes, nose, and mouth.
Animals that survive are destroyed. Additionally, when one laboratory’s research on animals establishes something significant, scores of other labs repeat the experiment, and more thousands of animals are needlessly tortured and killed. Few labs buy their animal test subjects from legitimate pet stores, and the majority use illegal pet dealers. There are many stolen animal dealers that house the animals before, during, and after testing. These farms most frequently hold animals between tests while the animals recuperate before facing another research ordeal. These so-called farms in question are mainly old barn-like buildings used as hospitals, and convalescent (recovery) wards are filthy overcrowded pens. In particular, at one farm, dogs with open chest wounds and badly infected incisions, so weak that many could not stand, were the order of the day.
These dogs were “recuperating” from open-heart and kidney surgery. Secondly, a litter of two-day-old pups was found in a basket, with no food provisions insight. Finally, in every pen, there were dogs suffering from highly contagious diseases. An animal’s road to a lab is seldom a direct one. Whether he’s stolen picked up as a stray or purchased, there’s a detour first to the animal dealer’s farm; There he waits- never under satisfactory conditions- until his ride, and often life, comes to an end at the laboratory. Every day of the year, hundreds of thousands of fully conscious animals are scalded, beaten, or crushed to death every day of the year, and more are subjected to exotic surgery and then allowed to die slowly and in agony. There is no reason for this suffering to continue. In conclusion, animal testing is inhumane, and no animal should be forced to endure such torture. Waste in government is one thing; it seems to be an accepted liability of democracy. But the wasting of lives is something else. How did it ever get this way?
Cite this page
This content was submitted by our community members and reviewed by Essayscollector Team. All content on this page is verified and owned by Essayscollector Team. All comments and user reviews are moderated by Essayscollector Team. In the case of any content-related problem, you can reach us through the report button.